Prince Harry has been accused of using his lack of security in Britain as an excuse to not set foot in the country.

Royal biographer Duncan Larcombe wrote an article for Closer UK in its March 28 issue and claimed that the Duke of Sussex might be hiding the truth as to why he doesn’t want to return home.

Larcombe said that it’s more likely for the Duke of Sussex to want to avoid being booed by Britons when he sets foot in the United Kingdom.

“In my opinion, the security issue is a total excuse. Harry has returned to the UK since moving to the States, for Philip’s funeral, and for his late mother’s memorial service, and there hasn’t been a security threat. What more threat will there be in the UK than there will be in The Hague? I think he’s honestly probably more fearful of being booed by the British public and of facing his family,” Larcombe said.

The royal biographer added that Prince Harry must return to the United Kingdom to show his support for Queen Elizabeth. And he should also consider bringing his two children with him because they have not seen the royal family for over two years.

Meanwhile, Larcombe also weighed in on some of the controversies that Prince Harry faced in recent weeks.

“Harry’s appearance at the Texas Rodeo was totally bizarre, almost as if he was trying to immerse himself in American culture. It was especially bizarre as it so clearly goes against Meghan’s animal rights beliefs. And Meghan’s absence from the Super Bowl was baffling too,” he said.

According to the royal biographer, Prince Harry also cut ties with some of his closest friends, which could be a sign that his relationship with Markle is on a downward spiral.

“I think one of the biggest signs of a relationship not going well is that one or both of you become very isolated from the friends and family and people who love you and who you grew up with. And this is what happened with Harry since being with Meghan. It’s worrying as he’s more alienated than ever now – which shows things aren’t going well,” he said.

However, it is important to note that Larcombe’s claims are based entirely on his opinions.